linux-kernel - Re: PM regression in next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180112215010.GG4821@atomide.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:50:10 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PM regression in next

* Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> [180112 21:15]:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:07:06PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
> > (twl4030_dummy_read [snd_soc_twl4030]) from [<bf1cc3b4>]
> >   (snd_soc_codec_drv_read+0x1c/0x28 [snd_soc_core])
> > (snd_soc_codec_drv_read [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf1da1cc>]
> >   (snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets+0x29c/0x578 [snd_soc_core])
> > (snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf1d2f30>]
> >   (snd_soc_register_card+0xad0/0xe30 [snd_soc_core])
> > (snd_soc_register_card [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf1e1850>]
> >   (devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x30/0x70 [snd_soc_core])
> > (devm_snd_soc_register_card [snd_soc_core]) from [<bf234364>]
> >   (omap_twl4030_probe+0x100/0x1d0 [snd_soc_omap_twl4030])
> > (omap_twl4030_probe [snd_soc_omap_twl4030]) from [<c0606660>]
> >   (platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0)
> 
> So does the read not happen otherwise?  Or is it failing somehow and the
> error getting ignored?

All the snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets() related reads go missing
without the .read being there. Probably the same story for
writes.

> > So probably there are other asoc drivers broken too with these
> > kind of patches until snd_soc_codec_drv_write() and
> > snd_soc_codec_drv_read() are fixed?
> 
> I rather suspect someone would've noticed by now TBH - I suspect this is
> more likely to be an issue with the rather baroque code that the TWL
> drivers have possibly coupled with the whole multiple I2C devices issue.

Hmm these calls are in sound/soc/soc-core.c though? But yeah, sure
it could be some legacy code issue somewhere..

Based on a quick grep these have .read and .write removed in next
so they may all be broken now:

sound/soc/codecs/cx20442.c
sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c
sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c
sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
sound/soc/codecs/uda1380.c
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c

Can you confirm that some of these are still working?

Regards,

Tony