linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix kconfig/conf's help

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7008e72-e762-a86d-8a39-415eae55dae9@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:49:41 -0800
From:   Marc Herbert <Marc.Herbert@...el.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
        Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@...el.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove silentoldconfig from "make help"; fix
 kconfig/conf's help

Masahiro,

On 09/01/2018 23:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

>  >   "(oldconfig used to be more verbose)"

>    The historical background is git.
>    If people are interested in archeology,
>    they would be able to do it by "git log", "git blame", etc.
>    We are generally interested in the current behavior.

I'd like to keep that sentence because it's there to explain the legacy and
confusing "--silentoldconfig" name which unfortunately still sticks out in
the *current* conf.c interface.

+       printf("  --silentoldconfig       Similar to oldconfig but generates configuration in\n"
+              "                          include/{generated/,config/} (oldconfig used to be more verbose)\n");

The purpose of this sentence is to warn people that: "silentoldconfig is
just archeology, so you can safely ignore it" and save them time.

The alternative I considered was to entirely remove "silentconfig" not just
from the Makefile's help but from the conf.c help too.

Thoughts?

-- 
Marc