lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iV_UKkaCoA_jvPLDF-E6roSxJ65+ua5L-xDia-Sa=mAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 01:28:12 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ACPI: Disable AER when _OSC control bit is clear.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:03:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> > +       if (!(requested & control & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
>> >>
>> >> One of the operators above needs to be a && I suppose?
>> >>
>> >
>> > It's a 3-way bitwise AND to check that OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL is
>> > set in both "requested" and "control".
>> >
>> > IOW, we check if AER was requested by the OS and that the platform
>> > granted the request.
>>
>> OK
>
> This definitely needs a comment - people will keep tripping over this.

Fair enough.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ