[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86d6a0f0a9907f3fb2cfda504f4981f6@natalenko.name>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:02:58 +0100
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/2] block, bfq: two pending patches
Hi.
13.01.2018 12:05, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> here are again the two pending patches you asked me to resend [1]. One
> of them, fixing read-starvation problems, was accompanied by a cover
> letter. I'm pasting the content of that cover letter below.
>
> The patch addresses (serious) starvation problems caused by
> request-tag exhaustion, as explained in more detail in the commit
> message. I started from the solution in the function
> kyber_limit_depth, but then I had to define more articulate limits, to
> counter starvation also in cases not covered in kyber_limit_depth.
> If this solution proves to be effective, I'm willing to port it
> somehow to the other schedulers.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg21586.html
>
> Paolo Valente (2):
> block, bfq: limit tags for writes and async I/O
> block, bfq: limit sectors served with interactive weight raising
>
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 158
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> block/bfq-iosched.h | 17 ++++++
> block/bfq-wf2q.c | 3 +
> 3 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.15.1
I'm running the system with these patches since the end of December, so
with regard to stability and visible smoke:
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
for both of them.
Many thanks, Paolo!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists