[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180113195205.GB6389@himanshu-Vostro-3559>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 01:22:05 +0530
From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Rename
kzalloc-simple to zalloc-simple
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 05:13:36PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Himanshu Jha
> <himanshujha199640@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I used 'git mv'.
> >
> > It doesn't matter when applying through 'git am', both will result the
> > same AFAIK and only difference is that the patch files generated by 'git
> > format-patch' are different. But that is not important I think.
>
> You missed the -M option when running 'git format'.
>
> For reviewers it is not that easy to realize that the 448 lines of the
> original file are the same as the ones in the new file.
>
> The -M option generates a much cleaner patch.
I guess you're right because patch has many lines.
No problem, I will send again with a much cleaner patch. :-)
--
Thanks
Himanshu Jha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists