linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Maintain a mask of active streams

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1488354c-99b0-fa64-a88c-0fa065df4b7d@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date:   Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:34:01 +0100
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     timur@...i.org, broonie@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com, caleb@...me.org,
        arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com, lukma@...x.de, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Maintain a mask of active streams

On 11.01.2018 07:43, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Checking TE and RE bits in SCR register doesn't work for AC97 mode
> which enables SSIEN, TE and RE in the fsl_ssi_setup_ac97() that's
> called during probe().
> 
> So when running into the trigger(), it will always get the result
> of both TE and RE being enabled already, even if actually there is
> no active stream.
> 
> This patch fixes this issue by adding a variable to log the active
> streams manually.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Caleb Crome <caleb@...me.org>
> ---
>  sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
> index 491b660..aa14a5d 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ struct fsl_ssi_soc_data {
>   * @cpu_dai_drv: CPU DAI driver for this device
>   *
>   * @dai_fmt: DAI configuration this device is currently used with
> + * @streams: Mask of current active streams: BIT(TX) and BIT(RX)
>   * @i2s_net: I2S and Network mode configurations of SCR register
>   * @use_dma: DMA is used or FIQ with stream filter
>   * @use_dual_fifo: DMA with support for dual FIFO mode
> @@ -245,6 +246,7 @@ struct fsl_ssi {
>  	struct snd_soc_dai_driver cpu_dai_drv;
>  
>  	unsigned int dai_fmt;
> +	u8 streams;
>  	u8 i2s_net;
>  	bool use_dma;
>  	bool use_dual_fifo;
> @@ -440,15 +442,14 @@ static void fsl_ssi_fifo_clear(struct fsl_ssi *ssi, bool is_rx)
>  static void fsl_ssi_config(struct fsl_ssi *ssi, bool enable,
>  			   struct fsl_ssi_regvals *vals)
>  {
> +	bool dir = (&ssi->regvals[TX] == vals) ? TX : RX;
Using a bool variable for a bit index (and array index in other parts
of code) looks just wrong.

Even a simple int would look better IMHO here (and in patch 5 that
rewrites this line a bit).

Maciej