[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e285df9-834b-41bf-1a09-a8de3f2a1f7c@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:40:31 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc: timur@...i.org, broonie@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com, caleb@...me.org,
arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com, lukma@...x.de, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt()
On 11.01.2018 07:43, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt() is a helper function being called from
> fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt() as an ASoC operation and fsl_ssi_hw_init()
> mainly for AC97 format initialization.
>
> This patch cleans the _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt() in following ways:
> * Removing *dev pointer in the parameters as it's included in the
> *ssi pointer of struct fsl_ssi.
> * Using regmap_update_bits() instead of regmap_read() with masking
> the value manually.
> * Removing TXBIT0 configurations since this bit is set to 1 as its
> reset value and there is no use case so far to unset it. And it
> is safe to remove since regmap_update_bits() won't touch it.
The old code set this bit in any mode other than AC'97 (where the
hardware always treats this bit as set regardless of the actual value).
I would play safe here and not rely on this bit being set by a SSI
reset on all SSI models.
> * Moving baudclk check to the switch-case routine to skip the I2S
> master check. And moving SxCCR.DC settings after baudclk check.
> * Adding format settings for SND_SOC_DAIFMT_AC97 like others.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Caleb Crome <caleb@...me.org>
> ---
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
> index 178c192..213962a 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
> @@ -855,42 +855,27 @@ static int fsl_ssi_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt(struct device *dev,
> - struct fsl_ssi *ssi, unsigned int fmt)
> +static int _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt(struct fsl_ssi *ssi, unsigned int fmt)
> {
> - struct regmap *regs = ssi->regs;
> - u32 strcr = 0, stcr, srcr, scr, mask;
> + u32 strcr = 0, scr = 0, stcr, srcr, mask;
>
> ssi->dai_fmt = fmt;
>
> - if (fsl_ssi_is_i2s_master(ssi) && IS_ERR(ssi->baudclk)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "missing baudclk for master mode\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - regmap_read(regs, REG_SSI_SCR, &scr);
> - scr &= ~(SSI_SCR_SYN | SSI_SCR_I2S_MODE_MASK);
> /* Synchronize frame sync clock for TE to avoid data slipping */
> scr |= SSI_SCR_SYNC_TX_FS;
>
> - mask = SSI_STCR_TXBIT0 | SSI_STCR_TFDIR | SSI_STCR_TXDIR |
> - SSI_STCR_TSCKP | SSI_STCR_TFSI | SSI_STCR_TFSL | SSI_STCR_TEFS;
> - regmap_read(regs, REG_SSI_STCR, &stcr);
> - regmap_read(regs, REG_SSI_SRCR, &srcr);
> - stcr &= ~mask;
> - srcr &= ~mask;
> -
> /* Use Network mode as default */
> ssi->i2s_net = SSI_SCR_NET;
> switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_FORMAT_MASK) {
> case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S:
> - regmap_update_bits(regs, REG_SSI_STCCR,
> - SSI_SxCCR_DC_MASK, SSI_SxCCR_DC(2));
> - regmap_update_bits(regs, REG_SSI_SRCCR,
> - SSI_SxCCR_DC_MASK, SSI_SxCCR_DC(2));
> switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_MASTER_MASK) {
> case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFS:
> case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS:
> + if (IS_ERR(ssi->baudclk)) {
> + dev_err(ssi->dev,
> + "missing baudclk for master mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
The original code did this check only for fsl_ssi_is_i2s_master(ssi),
that is, only for SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS while here you also do it for
SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFS.
Was this changed on purpose?
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists