linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Switch thunk names to match final GCC patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFw75zzEyr_fD9LrbcGgeQp=Jb20MpFHp-8SjWid0kdNpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:29:47 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc:     GCC Patches <gcc-patches@....gnu.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Switch thunk names to match final GCC patches

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:23 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk> wrote:
> I think we *shouldn't* do this. Uros said we could look at it and make
> a decision, and GCC would implement what we decide. Up to Linus.

Regardless of whether we end up having to do this, I'm not doing rc8
with it, and let's hope we can just skip it entirely.

It seems silly to have the 'r' for the r8-r15 case, but not the legacy
registers.

                  Linus