[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <603205fb-21e5-859c-605c-fbd7b44438c0@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:37:37 +0100
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
kemi.wang@...el.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
On 15/01/2018 18:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> On 12/01/2018 19:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Introduce CONFIG_SPF which turns on the Speculative Page Fault handler when
>>>> building for 64bits with SMP.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> index a317d5594b6a..d74353b85aaf 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,10 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
>>>> config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
>>>> def_bool y
>>>>
>>>> +config SPF
>>>> + def_bool y
>>>> + depends on X86_64 && SMP
>>>
>>> Can you please put that into a generic place as
>>>
>>> config SPF
>>> bool
>>>
>>> and let the architectures select it.
>>
>> I'll change that to let the architectures (x86 and ppc64 currently)
>> selecting it, but the definition will remain in the arch/xxx/Kconfig file
>> since it depends on the architecture support in the page fault handler.
>
> Errm. No.
>
> config SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> bool
>
> goes into a generic config file, e.g. mm/Kconfig
>
> Each architecture which implements support does:
>
> select SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>
> in arch/xxx/Kconfig
Oh ok, I think I got it this time ;)
Will do this way, this will be smarter.
Thanks a lot,
Laurent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists