[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
|
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbf3e9ff-f7e1-32c2-546d-85fd198c2a3b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:56:18 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: tegra: Mark HCLK, SCLK and EMC as critical
On 10.01.2018 16:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Machine dies if HCLK, SCLK or EMC is disabled. Hence mark these clocks
> as critical.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
> ---
>
> Change log:
> v2: Fixed accidentally missed marking EMC as critical on Tegra30 and
> Tegra124. Switched to a use of common EMC gate definition on Tegra20
> and Tegra30.
>
> v3: Dropped marking PLL_P outputs as critical, because seems they are
> not so critical. Although, I still haven't got a definitive answer
> about what exact HW functions are affected by the fixed-clocks.
> Anyway it should be cleaner to correct the actual drivers.
Stephen / Michael, would it be possible to schedule these patches for 4.16? My
T20 and T30 devices aren't working without the 'critical clocks' patch. Things
happen to work with the opensource u-boot, but not with the proprietary
bootloader. It's probably not a big deal that out-of-tree devices are broken,
although would be nice to have one problem less.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists