[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJeuY799nhZazzRb8JRf6juvWs158pj2LAHpfQ78d-mtO73Y=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:19:04 +0800
From: Hao Zhang <hao5781286@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] ARM: dts: add pwm node for r40.
2018-01-15 16:38 GMT+08:00 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 02:43:39PM +0800, Hao Zhang wrote:
>> 2018-01-11 20:47 GMT+08:00 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>:
>> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:34:12PM +0800, hao_zhang wrote:
>> >> This patch add pwm node for r40.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: hao_zhang <hao5781286@...il.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi
>> >> index 173dcc1..84c963c 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40.dtsi
>> >> @@ -295,6 +295,11 @@
>> >> bias-pull-up;
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> + pwm_pins: pwm-pins {
>> >> + pins = "PB2", "PB3";
>> >> + function = "pwm";
>> >> + };
>> >> +
>> >
>> > Is it the only combination of pins that is usable?
>> >
>> > If so, you can add the pinctrl-0 property directly in the pwm nodes.
>> >
>>
>> There are 8 channel pwm of R40/V40/T3, the pins that can be configed
>> to pwm are: PB2, PB3, PI20, PI21, PB20, PB21, PB9, PB10
>
> And a single controller, or several of them?
Single controller with 8 channels pwm output.
>
>> PB2, PB3 can be configed on bananapi-m2-ultra and on my T3 board,
>> but the other pins is not exist on the board or some pin is confilct
>> with other functions, so i just add PB2, PB3. but i think split it
>> is better, just like this :
>>
>> pwm0_pin: pwm0-pin {
>> pins = "PB2";
>> function = "pwm";
>> };
>>
>> pwm1_pin: pwm1-pin {
>> pins = "PB3";
>> function = "pwm";
>> };
>
> Yep, that would be better. If it's just a matter of channels, maybe we
> can even name them pwm-ch0-pin and pwm-ch1-pin? That would be more
> explicit.
>
Agree
>> the node of pwm2~7 should also be added here?
>
> If there's no users, no.
>
>> On sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts:
>> because of the special customize board, i think just add pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_pin>
>> (PB3 I just use to test pwm channel 1)for bananapi-m2-ultra board is enough.
>>
>> &pwm {
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_pin>;
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>
> It depends if that PWM is used as a PWM all the time (for example to
> drive a backlight for a panel tied to the board), or if it's exported
> through one of the generic pin headers, please leave it populated but
> disabled (with a comment that it is exported on one of the pin of the
> headers)
>
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists