[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180115001111.GC2925@Asurada-CZ80>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:11:12 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: timur@...i.org, broonie@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com, caleb@...me.org,
arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com, lukma@...x.de, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Clean up _fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt()
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:40:31PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> > case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S:
> > - regmap_update_bits(regs, REG_SSI_STCCR,
> > - SSI_SxCCR_DC_MASK, SSI_SxCCR_DC(2));
> > - regmap_update_bits(regs, REG_SSI_SRCCR,
> > - SSI_SxCCR_DC_MASK, SSI_SxCCR_DC(2));
> > switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_MASTER_MASK) {
> > case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFS:
> > case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS:
> > + if (IS_ERR(ssi->baudclk)) {
> > + dev_err(ssi->dev,
> > + "missing baudclk for master mode\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> The original code did this check only for fsl_ssi_is_i2s_master(ssi),
> that is, only for SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS while here you also do it for
> SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFS.
You are right. This patch isn't supposed to change that. I mixed an
intention from another patch. Will revise this part in the v3.
Thanks a lot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists