lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180115123420.562738607@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:35:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 086/118] mux: core: fix double get_device()

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

commit aa1f10e85b0ab53dee85d8e293c8159d18d293a8 upstream.

class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mux/core.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/mux/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct devi
 	return dev->of_node == data;
 }
 
+/* Note this function returns a reference to the mux_chip dev. */
 static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(stru
 	    (!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
 			np, args.np);
+		put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -476,10 +478,10 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(stru
 	if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
 			np, controller, args.np);
+		put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
 	return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mux_control_get);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ