[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180115042828.21004-1-yangbo@deepin.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:28:28 +0800
From: Yang Bo <yangbo@...pin.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yang Bo <yangbo@...pin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/kprobe: unbalanced preempt counter in kprobe_{fault,debug}_handler
Don't see any preempt_disable() in do_debug() and do_page_fault(),
there is no need to call preempt_enable_no_resched() here.
Signed-off-by: Yang Bo <yangbo@...pin.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 1ea5c9caa8f1..6f2c43e33674 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -969,7 +969,6 @@ int kprobe_debug_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
reset_current_kprobe();
out:
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
/*
* if somebody else is singlestepping across a probe point, flags
@@ -1017,7 +1016,6 @@ int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
else
reset_current_kprobe();
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
} else if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE ||
kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE) {
/*
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists