[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc06bb07-6411-219f-9094-4bc2161dbc14@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:32:06 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:7111:23: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
On 15/01/2018 13:34, David Binderman wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
> Source code is
>
>
> switch(vcpu->arch.mp_state) {
> case KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED:
> vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = false;
> vcpu->arch.mp_state =
> KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
> vcpu->arch.apf.halted = false;
> break;
>
> Suggest either add the missing break or add a fallthrough comment.
It's meant to be a fall-through to the "runnable" case (note that
mp_state becomes KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE at the end of the first "case").
Would you like to post a patch yourself?
Thanks,
Paolo
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> David Binderman
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists