[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180115123356.731836241@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:35:06 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 67/87] bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
commit 8041902dae5299c1f194ba42d14383f734631009 upstream.
convert_ctx_accesses() replaces single bpf instruction with a set of
instructions. Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data while patching.
It's needed to make sure subsequent 'for(all insn)' loops
have matching insn and insn_aux_data.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2107,6 +2107,41 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(stru
insn->src_reg = 0;
}
+/* single env->prog->insni[off] instruction was replaced with the range
+ * insni[off, off + cnt). Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data by copying
+ * [0, off) and [off, end) to new locations, so the patched range stays zero
+ */
+static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len,
+ u32 off, u32 cnt)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+
+ if (cnt == 1)
+ return 0;
+ new_data = vzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * prog_len);
+ if (!new_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off);
+ memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off,
+ sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1));
+ env->insn_aux_data = new_data;
+ vfree(old_data);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct verifier_env *env, u32 off,
+ const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
+
+ new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, off, patch, len);
+ if (!new_prog)
+ return NULL;
+ if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog->len, off, len))
+ return NULL;
+ return new_prog;
+}
+
/* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
* into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
*/
@@ -2132,7 +2167,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct v
else
continue;
- if (env->insn_aux_data[i].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
+ if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
continue;
cnt = env->prog->aux->ops->
@@ -2143,8 +2178,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct v
return -EINVAL;
}
- new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i + delta, insn_buf,
- cnt);
+ new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists