[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180115142828.wgytctikk7qvrvg6@treble>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 08:28:28 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: x86: Meltdown/Spectre_v2 status
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:55:17AM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> FWIW we've done a backport of the sysfs/vulnerability and retpoline
> parts to 4.9, including cherry-picking a few earlier needed commits:
> http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y
>
> Josh, I'd very much appreciate your eyes on my objtool-related
> backports — both your retpoline-specific patches, as well as the
> .discard.* bits they depended on. Thanks.
>
> Bringing ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT in as-is seemed like the same thing to do
> too.
The objtool-related backports look good.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists