[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180115164428.498966552@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:44:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] objtool validation of static branches
Because dwmw2 is a wee bit paranoid and GCC has a history of being slightly
retarded at times; here are a few patches that validate it will in fact
generate sensible code for static branches.
With this I hope to take away dwmw2's concerns for hard relying on asm-goto.
With that, we can stop sprinkling LFENCE all over the place with the IBRS/IBPB
patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists