[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801161931480.2366@nanos>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 19:31:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/hyper-v: redirect reenlightment notifications
on CPU offlining
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> It is very unlikely for CPUs to get offlined when we run on Hyper-V as
> we have a protection in vmbus module which prevents it when we have any
> VMBus devices assigned. This, however, may change in future if an option
> to reassign an already active channel will be added. It is also possible
> to run without any Hyper-V devices of have a CPU with no assigned channels.
>
> Reassign reenlightenment notifications to some other active CPU when
> the CPU which is assigned to get them goes offline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists