[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A5CE7E7@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:11:24 +0000
From: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] retpoline/module: Warn for missing retpoline in
module
> I just sent a v3 that changes the VERMAGIC only, based on Greg's
> earlier feedback.
>
> It has the drawbacks that it:
> - refuses loading instead of warns
> - doesn't stop refusing when the feature is runtime disabled
>
> But it's much simpler, just a few lines of ifdef.
I think simple is good at this point
Powered by blists - more mailing lists