linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/44] clk: davinci: Add platform information for TI DA850 PLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9c0c0c5-ca81-ec0c-358d-f45299250f42@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:07:07 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/44] clk: davinci: Add platform information for TI
 DA850 PLL

On Monday 08 January 2018 07:47 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> +void __init da850_pll_clk_init(void __iomem *pll0, void __iomem *pll1)
> +{
> +	const struct davinci_pll_divclk_info *info;
> +
> +	davinci_pll_clk_register("pll0", "ref_clk", pll0);

I think this will be more readable with empty lines between these
function calls. So here ..

> +	davinci_pll_aux_clk_register("pll0_aux_clk", "ref_clk", pll0);

.. here

> +	for (info = da850_pll0_divclk_info; info->name; info++)
> +		davinci_pll_divclk_register(info, pll0);
> +
> +	davinci_pll_clk_register("pll1", "ref_clk", pll1);

.. and here.

> +	for (info = da850_pll1_divclk_info; info->name; info++)
> +		davinci_pll_divclk_register(info, pll1);

I see that you have included empty line only when changing the PLL, but
I feel its more readable with the additional spacing suggested.

Same comment for other patches too with similar function implemented.
With that minor comment:

Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>

Thanks,
Sekhar