[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801161409120.1823@nanos>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:09:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
cc: vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, davidcc@...gle.com,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
1733662@...s.launchpad.net,
"Roderick W. Smith" <rod.smith@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][v4.14.y][v4.15] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo
list processing
Vikas, Fenghua can you please look at that ASAP?
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>
> > Hi Vikas,
> >
> > A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> > bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> >
> > commit 24247aeeabe99eab13b798ccccc2dec066dd6f07
> > Author: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Tue Aug 15 18:00:43 2017 -0700
> >
> > x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo list processing
> >
> >
> > The regression was introduced as of v4.14-r1 and still exists with
> > current mainline. The trace with v4.15-rc7 is in comment #44[1].
> >
> > I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
> > you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> > or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>
> That stinks like a use after free. Can you run with KASAN enabled?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists