linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: xlnx_vcu: Use bitwise & rather than logical && on clkoutdiv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:22:34 +0000
From:   Dhaval Rajeshbhai Shah <DSHAH@...inx.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: xlnx_vcu: Use bitwise & rather than logical
 && on clkoutdiv

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva [mailto:garsilva@...eddedor.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 11:15 AM
> To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>; Dhaval Rajeshbhai Shah
> <DSHAH@...inx.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: xlnx_vcu: Use bitwise & rather than logical && on
> clkoutdiv
> 
> Currently clkoutdiv is being operated on by a logical && operator rather than a
> bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit flag operations.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1463959 ("Logical vs. bitwise operator")
> Fixes: cee8113a295a ("soc: xilinx: xlnx_vcu: Add Xilinx ZYNQMP VCU logicoreIP
> init driver")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c index
> c1d6f1b..a840c02 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int xvcu_set_vcu_pll_info(struct xvcu_device
> *xvcu)
>  	 */
>  	vcu_pll_ctrl = xvcu_read(xvcu->vcu_slcr_ba, VCU_PLL_CTRL);
>  	clkoutdiv = vcu_pll_ctrl >> VCU_PLL_CTRL_CLKOUTDIV_SHIFT;
> -	clkoutdiv = clkoutdiv && VCU_PLL_CTRL_CLKOUTDIV_MASK;
> +	clkoutdiv = clkoutdiv & VCU_PLL_CTRL_CLKOUTDIV_MASK;
>  	if (clkoutdiv != 1) {
>  		dev_err(xvcu->dev, "clkoutdiv value is invalid\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.7.4

Acked-by: Dhaval Shah <dshah@...inx.com>

Thanks & Regards,
Dhaval