[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180116142825.376986833@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:28:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] objtool validation of static branches and retpoline
Because dwmw2 is a wee bit paranoid and GCC has a history of being slightly
retarded at times; here are a few patches that validate it will in fact
generate sensible code for static branches.
Also, per dwmw2's request, code to validate retpoline code does not include
dynamic jump or calls.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h | 3 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h | 7 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 82 ++++++------
arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h | 23 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 5 +-
scripts/Makefile.build | 4 +
tools/objtool/builtin-check.c | 5 +-
tools/objtool/builtin-orc.c | 4 +-
tools/objtool/check.c | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/objtool/check.h | 3 +-
tools/objtool/special.c | 13 +-
tools/objtool/special.h | 1 +
12 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists