linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with LLC size check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180116145932.fi5mgk2hxvzmmb7p@pd.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:59:32 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     tony.luck@...el.com, hmh@....eng.br, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with LLC
 size check

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Jia Zhang wrote:
> or driver init style?
> 
> @@ -996,5 +999,7 @@ struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void)
>                 return NULL;
>         }
> 
> +       llc_size_per_core = calc_llc_size_per_core(c);
> +
>         return &microcode_intel_ops;
>  }

Yes, that looks ok.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.