linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/5] per-event settings fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180116153805.GD16107@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:38:05 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Hendrick Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@...il.com>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] per-event settings fixes

Em Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:27:52PM +0100, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
>  --- ::1 ping statistics ---
> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.047/0.047/0.047/0.000 ms
>      0.000 probe_libc:inet_pton:(3ffb4bc2060))
> [root@...60047 perf]#
> 
> Test fails, I would have expected some callchain output.
> 
> [root@...60047 perf]# ./perf trace --no-syscalls --call-graph dwarf --max-stack 4
>         -e probe_libc:inet_pton/max-stack=3/ ping -6 -c 1 ::1
> PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.055 ms
> 
>  --- ::1 ping statistics ---
> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.055/0.055/0.055/0.000 ms
>      0.000 probe_libc:inet_pton:(3ff7e6c2060))
> [root@...60047 perf]#
> 
> Test fails, I would have expected some callchain output.
> 
> It looks like /max-stack=3/ without ,call-graph=dwarf
> does not trigger the stack unwinding.

Ok, will work on those, then redo all the tests you did, grr, tricky
stuff.

- Arnaldo