[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2f4652e-1eee-a1ca-d5f7-640552fc3594@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:40:26 -0500
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"davidcc@...gle.com" <davidcc@...gle.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"1733662@...s.launchpad.net" <1733662@...s.launchpad.net>,
"Roderick W. Smith" <rod.smith@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][v4.14.y][v4.15] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo
list processing
On 01/16/2018 08:32 AM, Shankar, Ravi V wrote:
> Vikas on vacation until end of the month. Fenghua will look into this
> issue.
>
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 5:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de
> <mailto:tglx@...utronix.de>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Vikas, Fenghua can you please look at that ASAP?
>>
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Vikas,
>>>>
>>>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
>>>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved
>>>> this bug:
>>>>
>>>> commit 24247aeeabe99eab13b798ccccc2dec066dd6f07
>>>> Author: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com
>>>> <mailto:vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>>
>>>> Date: Tue Aug 15 18:00:43 2017 -0700
>>>>
>>>> x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo list processing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The regression was introduced as of v4.14-r1 and still exists with
>>>> current mainline. The trace with v4.15-rc7 is in comment #44[1].
>>>>
>>>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
>>>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>>>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>>>
>>> That stinks like a use after free. Can you run with KASAN enabled?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> tglx
Here is some data wiht KASAN enabled:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1733662/comments/51
Are there any specific logs you would like to see, or specific actions
executed?
Thanks,
Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists