linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180118092112.0e46a25c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:21:12 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c

between commit:

  349524bc0da6 ("powerpc: Don't preempt_disable() in show_cpuinfo()")

from the powerpc-fixes tree and commit:

  f5f563012a70 ("powerpc: Make newline in cpuinfo unconditional")

from the powerpc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
index 3f33869c6486,24da91768133..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
@@@ -346,10 -354,10 +346,7 @@@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_fil
  		   loops_per_jiffy / (500000/HZ),
  		   (loops_per_jiffy / (5000/HZ)) % 100);
  #endif
- 
- #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
  	seq_printf(m, "\n");
- #endif
 -
 -	preempt_enable();
 -
  	/* If this is the last cpu, print the summary */
  	if (cpumask_next(cpu_id, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
  		show_cpuinfo_summary(m);