linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / core: genpd fix and pm_runtime_force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWR+V8d3geQutKr+f+e7+H2D9k-2_-5kJp-4n0rzMXoWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:14:23 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / core: genpd fix and pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume()
 rework

Hi Rafael,

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 15 January 2018 at 14:22, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>>
>>> I did miss a small difference in topology: in pm/linux-next, H3 has DMA
>>> enabled for SCIF2, while M3 hasn't (yet).
>>> With DMA enabled on M3, it fails in the same way.
>>>
>>> As genpd_resume_noirq() no longer calls pm_runtime_force_resume(),
>>> rcar_dmac_runtime_resume() is no longer called, and the DMAC's registers
>>> are no longer reinitialized after system resume, breaking the serial port.
>>
>> In drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c, I would try to replace the below line:
>> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(rcar_dmac_sleep_suspend, rcar_dmac_sleep_resume)
>>
>> with:
>> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
>
> Yes, that probably is the least intrusive thing that can be done to
> address the issue.
>
>> in case that may be too early to suspend the dma device (which is
>> rather common for dma devices) then try;
>>
>> SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
>
> Good suggestion, and I would go straight for it anyway.
>
> Geert, can you try if this works, please?

Works. Both using SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and
SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(). But given this is a DMA engine
driver, I'd settle for the latter.

And I did verify doing so doesn't break the system without the patch
in $subject.

Thanks!

Will send a patch...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds