linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390: add system call to run tasks with modified branch prediction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180117132549.GC5708@osiris>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:25:49 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390: add system call to run tasks with modified
 branch prediction

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:14:52 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 01/17/2018 11:03 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > On 01/17/2018 10:48 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:  
> > >>          rc = syscall(__NR_s390_modify_bp);
> > >>          if (rc) {
> > >>                  perror("s390_modify_bp");
> > >>                  exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> > >>          }  
> > > 
> > > Isn't this traditionally done through personality or prctl?  
> > 
> > I think we want this per thread (and not per process). So I assume personality
> > will not work out. Can a prctl be done per thread?
> 
> The prctl interface seems to be usable to set a per-thread control
> as well. But there is no architecture specific prctl as far as I
> can see. Maybe a common PR_SET_NOBP with an arch function like
> arch_set_nobp.

There is for example PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT, which is x86 specific. On
the other hand x86 even has an arch_prctl() system call... ;)