[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180117051120.GA28006@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 06:11:20 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
dwmw@...zon.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com, jeyu@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] retpoline: Add retpoline tag to VERMAGIC
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Add a marker for retpoline to the module VERMAGIC. This catches
> the case when a non RETPOLINE compiled module gets loaded into
> a retpoline kernel, making it insecure.
>
> It doesn't handle the case when retpoline has been runtime disabled.
> Even in this case the match of the retcompile status will be enforced.
> This implies that even with retpoline run time disabled all modules
> loaded need to be recompiled.
>
> This supersedes an earlier patch that did the same checking using
> a new module tag (so it's really a v3)
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists