[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <caa1bb6b-7338-a9b0-467e-d0cd09783a9c@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:00:34 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
jhugo@...eaurora.org, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com, ahs3@...hat.com,
Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
lenb@...nel.org, vkilari@...eaurora.org, morten.rasmussen@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/12] ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology
Table parsing
On 16/01/18 20:22, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
[..]
>>
>> I forgot to mention this earlier, I see you have used parentheses too
>> liberally at quite some place in this file like the above 4 line.
>> Please drop those unnecessary parentheses.
>
> Yes, those tend to get leftover when I remove code, I realized not long
> after posting this that in one of the previous patches I actually added
> a pair where there wasn't one because I first shuffled something into
> the if condition, then a few revisions later dropped it, and when I
> squashed it before posting the result was some pointless churn.
>
> I will rescan the whole set for this.
>
Better, just to avoid keeping such things until the end, resulting in
churning up series just for that.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists