linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/sun4i: Add a driver for the display frontend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180118072258.ucbchh32mhyln2qn@flea.lan>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:22:58 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, thomas@...sch.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/sun4i: Add a driver for the display frontend

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:43:31PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >         if (sun4i_drv_node_is_connector(node))
> >                 return 0;
> >
> > -       if (!sun4i_drv_node_is_frontend(node)) {
> > +       /*
> > +        * If the device is either just a regular device, or an
> > +        * enabled frontend supported by the driver, we add it to our
> > +        * component list.
> > +        */
> > +       if (!sun4i_drv_node_is_frontend(node) ||
> > +           (sun4i_drv_node_is_supported_frontend(node) &&
> > +            of_device_is_available(node))) {
> 
> Nit: sun4i_drv_node_is_supported_frontend should be a subset of
> sun4i_drv_node_is_frontend, so of_device_is_available should always
> be true at this point.

That's not really the condition though :)

It's if the device is *not* a frontend or if it is a supported
frontend that is available, add it to the endpoints list.

> > +       regmap_write(frontend->regs, SUN4I_FRONTEND_INPUT_FMT_REG,
> > +                    SUN4I_FRONTEND_INPUT_FMT_DATA_MOD(1) |
> > +                    SUN4I_FRONTEND_INPUT_FMT_DATA_FMT(in_fmt_val) |
> > +                    SUN4I_FRONTEND_INPUT_FMT_PS(1));
> > +       regmap_write(frontend->regs, SUN4I_FRONTEND_OUTPUT_FMT_REG,
> > +                    SUN4I_FRONTEND_OUTPUT_FMT_DATA_FMT(out_fmt_val));
> 
> Seems that you also need to set the "ALPHA_EN" bit for ARGB.

I have not seen that bit documented anywhere. Where is it coming from?

> > +       frontend->reset = devm_reset_control_get(dev, NULL);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(frontend->reset)) {
> > +               dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get our reset line\n");
> > +               return PTR_ERR(frontend->reset);
> > +       }
> > +       reset_control_reset(frontend->reset);
> 
> reset_control_reset leaves the reset control deasserted. At this
> point the clock might not be running, which might mean the internal
> state is not completely wiped out. (Though this really depends on
> the design of the internal logic.)
> 
> Maybe just assert it? It gets deasserted in the runtime PM callback
> later. And just to be safe, I would move it close to the end of the
> probe path, past all possible errors, so the hardware doesn't get
> touched until everything is ready. Or don't touch it anywhere in
> the probe path, and have the runtime PM resume function do a reset.

That seems like the best solution yes.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)