[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118015052.GB1812@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:50:52 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: kexec reboot fails with extra wbinvd introduced for AME SME
On 01/17/18 at 09:06am, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/17/2018 1:22 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> > [Modify the subject since this is a new problem, original io vector
> > issue has been fixed with one commit from Thomas]
> >
> > Add more cc according to below old discussion:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/27/574
> >
> > Tom, I'm not sure why you finally did not dynamically run wbinvd?
>
> That discussion was aimed at the wbinvd that was being performed
> in arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S, which is dynamically
> run based on a flag.
Oh, I did not notice that, sorry for referring a wrong discussion.
[snip]
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists