[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118133322.ep66qnyedjl6qeiv@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:33:22 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert()
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 03:28:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Implement the static (branch) assertion. It simply emits the address
> of the next instruction into a special section which objtool will read
> and validate against either __jump_table or .altinstructions.
>
> Use like:
>
> if (static_branch_likely(_key)) {
> arch_static_assert();
> /* do stuff */
> }
>
> Or
>
> if (static_cpu_has(_feat)) {
> arch_static_assert();
It looks to me like the asserts can be moved into the macros and the
assertion checking can happen by default ...?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists