linux-kernel - [RFC] Per file OOM badness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:47:48 -0500
From:   Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
CC:     <Christian.Koenig@....com>
Subject: [RFC] Per file OOM badness

Hi, this series is a revised version of an RFC sent by Christian König
a few years ago. The original RFC can be found at 
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-September/089778.html

This is the same idea and I've just adressed his concern from the original RFC 
and switched to a callback into file_ops instead of a new member in struct file.

Thanks,
Andrey