[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118165612.GS13726@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:56:12 +0100
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dsterba@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/99] XArray version 6
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:48:43AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Thank you! I shall attempt to debug. Was this with a btrfs root
> filesystem? I'm most suspicious of those patches right now, since they've
> received next to no testing. I'm going to put together a smaller patchset
> which just does the page cache conversion and nothing else in the hope
> that we can get that merged this year.
No, the root is ext3 and there was no btrfs filesytem mounted at the
time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists