lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118223010.GD25893@kudzu.us>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:30:10 -0500
From:   Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Allen.Hubbe@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ntb_hw_switchtec: Check for alignment of the
 buffer in mw_set_trans()

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:25:06AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> With Switchtec hardware, the buffer used for a memory window must be
> aligned to its size (the hardware only replaces the lower bits). In
> certain circumstances dma_alloc_coherent() will not provide a buffer
> that adheres to this requirement like when using the CMA and
> CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT is set lower than the buffer size.
> 
> When we get an unaligned buffer mw_set_trans() should return an error.
> We also log an error so we know the cause of the problem.
> 

Applied to ntb-next.

Thanks,
Jon

> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
> ---
> 
> v2: Use IS_ALIGNED macro as suggested by Allen
> 
>  drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
> index bcd5b6fb3800..6c6f991999b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
> @@ -320,6 +320,19 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_mw_set_trans(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int pidx, int widx,
>  	if (xlate_pos < 12)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, BIT_ULL(xlate_pos))) {
> +		/*
> +		 * In certain circumstances we can get a buffer that is
> +		 * not aligned to its size. (Most of the time
> +		 * dma_alloc_coherent ensures this). This can happen when
> +		 * using large buffers allocated by the CMA
> +		 * (see CMA_CONFIG_ALIGNMENT)
> +		 */
> +		dev_err(&sndev->stdev->dev,
> +			"ERROR: Memory window address is not aligned to it's size!\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	rc = switchtec_ntb_part_op(sndev, ctl, NTB_CTRL_PART_OP_LOCK,
>  				   NTB_CTRL_PART_STATUS_LOCKED);
>  	if (rc)
> --
> 2.11.0
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-ntb" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-ntb+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to linux-ntb@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-ntb/20171218182506.5219-2-logang%40deltatee.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ