linux-kernel - Re: [mm 4.15-rc8] Random oopses under memory pressure.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180119103342.GS6584@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:33:42 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        tony.luck@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz, aarcange@...hat.com,
        hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com, hughd@...gle.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, riel@...hat.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        vdavydov.dev@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [mm 4.15-rc8] Random oopses under memory pressure.

On Fri 19-01-18 13:02:59, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:22:13PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 18-01-18 18:40:26, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Make sure that pages are in the same section before doing pointer
> > > +	 * arithmetics.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (page_to_section(pvmw->page) != page_to_section(page))
> > > +		return false;
> > 
> > OK, THPs shouldn't cross memory sections AFAIK. My brain is meltdown
> > these days so this might be a completely stupid question. But why don't
> > you simply compare pfns? This would be just simpler, no?
> 
> In original code, we already had pvmw->page around and I thought it would
> be easier to get page for the pte intead of looking for pfn for both
> sides.
> 
> We these changes it's no longer the case.
> 
> Do you care enough to send a patch? :)

Well, memory sections are sparsemem concept IIRC. Unless I've missed
something page_to_section is quarded by SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS and that
is conditional to CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. THP is a generic code so using it
there is wrong unless I miss some subtle detail here.

Comparing pfn should be generic enough.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs