linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/memcontrol.c: Reduce reclaim retries in mem_cgroup_resize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180119153132.GF6584@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:31:32 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/memcontrol.c: Reduce reclaim retries in
 mem_cgroup_resize_limit()

On Fri 19-01-18 07:24:08, Shakeel Butt wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the explanation. Another query, we do not call
> drain_all_stock() in mem_cgroup_resize_limit() but memory_max_write()
> does call drain_all_stock(). Was this intentional or missed
> accidentally?

I think it is just an omission. I would have to look closer but I am
just leaving now and will be back on Tuesday. This is unrelated so I
would rather discuss it in a separate email thread.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs