[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180119164540.GT2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:45:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
Cc: Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: Allow fine-grained PMU access control
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
>
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
You've completely and utterly failed to explain why.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists