Message-ID: <10dab35c-9c79-5a77-0654-1e99621e4c0f@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:22:50 -0600
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
        Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Nishant Menon <nm@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: ti-rstctrl: use the reset-simple driver

Hi Tony,

On 01/16/2018 05:22 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> [180116 21:23]:
>> While this adaptation is very simple for replacing the RSTCTRL registers
>> from the hwmod data into an existing reset driver, I am afraid that it
>> doesn't fit well when you want to use the reset API from client drivers.
> 
> Well the reset controller framework is the Linux API for client
> drivers though so it already works well for the client drivers :)
> 
>> The RSTST is not accounted for (which is what we rely on for saying that
>> a deassert is successful), and this is currently only replacing part of
>> the omap4_prminst_{assert/deassert}_hardreset functionality, which in
>> itself is only a small portion of what the current drivers use
>> (omap_hwmod_{assert/deassert}_hardreset() functions.
> 
> Seems like that's a different set of patches as the RSTST
> registers require some API changes to the reset controller
> framework or runtime PM.
> 
> The RSTST registers mostly tell the device internal reset reason
> like watchdog reset for an accelerator. I'm not sure how the
> API for those would look like, do you have some ideas?

There are multiple RSTST registers, each of which with different bits. .
The PRM_RSTST is the one where you can catch the reset reasons (along
with few others), but otherwise most of the other IP-specific RSTST
registers capture the local reset status. The RSTST behavior is somewhat
similar to how the softreset status is tracked on each IP's SYSC/SYSS
registers. It does tell the reset status for some software triggered
resets in RSTCTRL, and can have additional bits as well for some PRCM
triggered h/w resets (like RETention reset).

> 
> Hmm, aren't you currently just reading the RSTST registers
> directly for remoteproc etc?

Nope, all the PRCM related registers are hidden away underneath the
hwmod layer, so the only code that I use is pm_runtime_{get/put}_sync()
directly and omap_device_{assert/deassert}_reset() through pdata-quirks.
Take a look in drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c and
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c (functional in mainline for OMAP4 and
OMAP5 DSP/IPU MMUs).

You can look through the reset sequences for any of DSP/IPU/IVA in any
of the TRMs, and you will notice that the various steps involve CLKCTRL,
CLKSTCTRL and RSTCTRL registers. There is a small delay between the
reset being released to having the module actually be out of reset, and
this is the status that is reflected in RSTST, so we do have to wait for
this. Today, this is automatically handled in hwmod code (See
omap4_prminst_deassert_hardreset()). The other register sequences are in
_deassert_hardreset() in omap_hwmod.c.

This design is just implementing the omap4_prminst_rmw_inst_reg_bits
line in omap4_prminst_deassert_hardreset(), and as such client drivers
cannot really use it as is without access to all the other registers
which have so far been hidden away underneath the hwmod layer.

> 
> And then we also have the CONTEXT register that tells if module
> context was lost during idle :) The API for that could simply be
> bool device_context_lost(struct device *dev) to describe that
> kind of reset. Or it could maybe also use reset_control_status()
> that returns -ECONNRESET? But then what resets the context lost
> state as we don't need to reset the device?

I am not sure why the CONTEXT register belongs to the same discussion as
the reset registers. In any case, I don't think any of the current code
relies on this (other than incrementing the debug counters).

> 
> It almost seems like the RSTST and CONTEXT should be client device
> PM state related registers instead of reset controller registers?
> But if we figure out the API them, then accessing them could
> be added for "ti,rstctrl" compatible with:
> 
> reg = <0x4 0x4>,
>        0x14 0x4>,
>        0x24 0x4>;
> reg-names = "rstctrl", "rststs", "context";

For K2 SoCs, we have done a ti-syscon-reset driver with these various
rstctrl and rststs registers and their bit offsets and masks (low or
high) incorporated. The reset integration is fairly straight-forward
there though as it is based on PSC and not PRCM, so there are not many
different registers involved.

> 
> Anyways, for managing various rstctrl bits and OCP softresets,
> here's what I was thinking we can do:
> 
> 1. We keep ocp softreset internal to the interconnect target module
>    driver and if child device drivers really need to access that we
>    can implement reset driver in the interconnect target module

Note that for IPs with hard-reset, you cannot program this register
unless the PRCM reset line is taken care of first. This is the case with
DSP/IPU MMUs for example (there's both a PRCM RSTCTRL as well as the
OCP_SOFTRESET within the MMU_SYSCONFIG, which only resets the MMU
sub-mdule registers). Also, the MODULEMODE and CLKCTRL registers apply
for the whole subsystem (DSP), while the OCP softreset bits apply only
to a child device (MMU) with the other child device being the DSP core
with your design.

> 
> 2. For rstctrl bits that are for a whole interconnect target module
>    we access them in the interconnect target module and the child
>    device driver can then do device_reset(dev->parent) if needed.
> 
> 3. For child module specific rstctrl bits we can have the child
>    devices map them directly in dts if the interconnect target
>    module does not need to worry about them
> 
> I briefly tested this yesterday with am33xx sgx module just to
> read some registers. Here are the dts nodes that I used for
> reference, I'll be posting the related ti-sysc driver changes
> after -rc1.

The OMAP IOMMU would be a better test given that there's no in-kernel
sgx module and we are not sure if the out-of-tree driver is functional
with these changes.

I have some unit-test code at
https://github.com/sumananna/omap-test-iommu.git

You would need to add a test node to DTS with reference to the MMU you
want to test.

> 
> prm_gfx: prm@...0 {
> 	compatible = "simple-bus";
> 	#address-cells = <1>;
> 	#size-cells = <1>;
> 	ranges = <0 0x1100 0x100>;
> 
> 	gfx_rstctrl: rstctrl@4 {
> 		compatible = "ti,rstctrl";
> 		reg = <0x4 0x4>;
> 		#reset-cells = <1>;
> 	};
> };
> 
> target-module@...00000 {
> 	compatible = "ti,sysc-omap4", "ti,sysc";
> 	ti,hwmods = "gfx";
> 	reg = <0x5600fe00 0x4>,
> 	      <0x5600fe10 0x4>;
> 	reg-names = "rev", "sysc";
> 	ti,sysc-midle = <SYSC_IDLE_FORCE>,
> 			<SYSC_IDLE_NO>,
> 			<SYSC_IDLE_SMART>;
> 	ti,sysc-sidle = <SYSC_IDLE_FORCE>,
> 			<SYSC_IDLE_NO>,
> 			<SYSC_IDLE_SMART>;
> 	clocks = <&gfx_l3_clkctrl AM3_GFX_CLKCTRL 0>;
> 	clock-names = "fck";
> 	resets = <&gfx_rstctrl 0>;
> 	reset-names = "rstctrl";
> 	#address-cells = <1>;
> 	#size-cells = <1>;
> 	ranges = <0 0x56000000 0x1000000>;
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Closed source PowerVR driver, no child device
> 	 * binding or driver in mainline
> 	 */
> };
> 
> So if we had a child device driver there and the gfx_rstctrl
> had other child device specific reset bits, they could be
> properties of the child device with resets = <&gfx_rstctrl 1>
> and so on. So hopefully that clarifies how the client drivers
> would use the resets?

If we are exposing all the other registers directly to client drivers,
then the client drivers can use the reset API directly. But if other
registers are hidden away underneath various frameworks, then we have
some sequencing issues.

Tero had done a series sometime back using notifiers to take care of
these sequencing steps, but that was deferred pending the other hwmod
cleanup. Last reference that touches it is here,
https://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=147279610902646&w=2

regards
Suman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists