[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180119144903.Horde.tbajXZQzjH9kwd_yYPMI5mo@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:49:03 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc: return boolean instead of integer in using_ipsec
Hi Ursula,
Quoting Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> On 01/19/2018 12:33 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Return statements in functions returning bool should use
>> true/false instead of 1/0.
>>
>> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> net/smc/smc.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
>> index 0bee9d1..ef13af4 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/smc.h
>> +++ b/net/smc/smc.h
>> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>> #else
>> static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>> {
>> - return 0;
>> + return false;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>
> Gustavo,
> thanks for reporting, but your improvement seems to be incomplete.
> Besides changing
> line 260 of net/smc/smc.h, line 255 should be adapted the same way. Will you
> come up with a second patch version here?
>
You are correct. I'll send a new patch shortly.
Thanks for the feedback.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists