linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 13/27] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1516326648-22775-14-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:50:34 -0800
From:   Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To:     mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        corbet@....net, arnd@...db.de
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
        khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        bsingharora@...il.com, hbabu@...ibm.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
        bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        linuxram@...ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 13/27] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey()

arch independent code calls arch_override_mprotect_pkey()
to return a pkey that best matches the requested protection.

This patch provides the implementation.

Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h |    5 ++++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h       |   21 +++++++++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c                |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 4d69223..3ba571d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ static inline bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 #define thread_pkey_regs_save(thread)
 #define thread_pkey_regs_restore(new_thread, old_thread)
 #define thread_pkey_regs_init(thread)
+
+static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_MEM_KEYS */
 
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index c7cc433..0a643b8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ static inline u64 pkey_to_vmflag_bits(u16 pkey)
 	return (((u64)pkey << VM_PKEY_SHIFT) & ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS);
 }
 
+static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled))
+		return 0;
+	return (vma->vm_flags & ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT;
+}
+
 #define arch_max_pkey() pkeys_total
 
 #define pkey_alloc_mask(pkey) (0x1 << pkey)
@@ -148,10 +155,22 @@ static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return __execute_only_pkey(mm);
 }
 
+extern int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					 int prot, int pkey);
 static inline int arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 					      int prot, int pkey)
 {
-	return 0;
+	if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Is this an mprotect_pkey() call? If so, never override the value that
+	 * came from the user.
+	 */
+	if (pkey != -1)
+		return pkey;
+
+	return __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(vma, prot, pkey);
 }
 
 extern int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index ee31ab5..7630c2f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -326,3 +326,39 @@ int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 		mm->context.execute_only_pkey = execute_only_pkey;
 	return execute_only_pkey;
 }
+
+static inline bool vma_is_pkey_exec_only(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	/* Do this check first since the vm_flags should be hot */
+	if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC)) != VM_EXEC)
+		return false;
+
+	return (vma_pkey(vma) == vma->vm_mm->context.execute_only_pkey);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This should only be called for *plain* mprotect calls.
+ */
+int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int prot,
+				  int pkey)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If the currently associated pkey is execute-only, but the requested
+	 * protection requires read or write, move it back to the default pkey.
+	 */
+	if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) && (prot & (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE)))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * The requested protection is execute-only. Hence let's use an
+	 * execute-only pkey.
+	 */
+	if (prot == PROT_EXEC) {
+		pkey = execute_only_pkey(vma->vm_mm);
+		if (pkey > 0)
+			return pkey;
+	}
+
+	/* Nothing to override. */
+	return vma_pkey(vma);
+}
-- 
1.7.1