lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy3Agx5ngYERyJZhLkgA1oP1e48VY4hPw0H5Yopw_GdGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:38:44 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot regression with bacf6b499e11 ("x86/mm: Use a struct to
 reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping") on top of -rc8

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Fedora got multiple reports of an early bootup crash post -rc8.
> Bisection showed bacf6b499e11 ("x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce
> parameters for SME PGD mapping") . It doesn't revert cleanly
> but if I revert the few other changes in arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> as well it boots up fine.

Odd. I've tried to read through that patch three times to find
anything it actually changes, and I can't find anything.

It looks like that patch should have absolutely no actual behavioral impact.

But clearly I'm missing something. Can anybody see what the mistake in
the conversion is?

             Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ