[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180121190430.ss22poeakvwzvcal@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 20:04:30 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: arjan@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, karahmed@...zon.de,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] x86/speculation: Add basic support for IBPB
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 06:54:22PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Because we're backporting this to every stable kernel under the sun,
> and they don't already require asm-goto.
Considering the cost of the barrier, I'd simplify the whole endeavor
*considerably* for backporting:
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, PRED_CMD_IBPB, 0);
Problem solved.
Upstream can then do static_cpu_has() if it wants to.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists