[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86po635trt.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:35:34 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Jayachandran C <jnair@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<jason@...edaemon.net>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will.deacon@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<Robert.Richter@...ium.com>, <Jan.Glauber@...ium.com>,
<Vadim.Lomovtsev@...ium.com>, <gklkml16@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add workaround for ThunderX2 erratum #174
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:00:48 +0000,
Jayachandran C wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:58:20AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> > This erratum is observed on the ThunderX2 GICv3 ITS. When a
> > MOVI command is used to change affinity of a LPI to a collection/cpu
> > on another node, the LPI is not delivered to the cpu.
> > An additional INV command is required after the MOVI to deliver
> > the LPI to the new destination.
> >
> > If we add INV after MOVI, there is a chance that we lose LPIs which
> > are raised when the affinity is changed. So for now, adding workaround fix
> > to disable inter node affinity change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2: Added workaround to avoid inter node affinity change.
> >
> > v1: Initial patch
> >
> > Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> > index fc1c884..fb27cb5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ stable kernels.
> > | Cavium | ThunderX Core | #27456 | CAVIUM_ERRATUM_27456 |
> > | Cavium | ThunderX Core | #30115 | CAVIUM_ERRATUM_30115 |
> > | Cavium | ThunderX SMMUv2 | #27704 | N/A |
> > +| Cavium | ThunderX2 ITS | #174 | CAVIUM_ERRATUM_174 |
> > | Cavium | ThunderX2 SMMUv3| #74 | N/A |
> > | Cavium | ThunderX2 SMMUv3| #126 | N/A |
> > | | | | |
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index c9a7e9e..0dbf3bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -461,6 +461,16 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_843419
> >
> > If unsure, say Y.
> >
> > +config CAVIUM_ERRATUM_174
> > + bool "Cavium ThunderX2 erratum 174"
> > + default y
> > + help
> > + Cavium ThunderX2 dual socket systems may loose interrupts
> > + on affinity change to a cpu on other node.
> > + This workaround fix avoids inter node affinity change.
>
> This has to be fixed up to match the commit message (and for spelling).
> I have seen some questions offlist about how important this fix is,
> and how it can affect users - so that would be useful to have in the
> description as well.
>
> To clarify, this errata comes into play only when the irq affinity is
> forced from the node given by the device (and ITS) affinity to another
> node. This should not happen in normal, useful configurations.
Define normal. That's all under control of userspace, and the kernel
doesn't really have a say. irqbalance will happily move interrupts
around. Disable all CPUs from node at runtime (again, from userspace),
and you'll get the exact same thing. I can't see what's so "abnormal"
about any of that.
> Also, we will hold further posting of this errata until we do another
> round of investigation with the hardware team for a better solution.
> If we can handle the pending interrupts for the small window of MOVI/INV
> in first workaround, we will not need this restriction at all.
What do you mean by "If we can handle the pending interrupts for the
small window of MOVI/INV"? Taking the interrupt on the source CPU?
Sure, that would be fine. But that's assuming that the souce CPU is in
a position to actually handle this, and is not simply going down.
If there is only a slight possibility that you may loose an interrupt
in the MOVI/INV window (which is not that small, since that's a 4
command sequence), your only other solution is to inject a spurious
interrupt to replace the one you may have lost in that window.
In the meantime, and until I see a patch fixing this (or a decent
explanation of why this isn't a problem), I'll consider it broken.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists