linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 39/47] arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180122083928.537571527@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:45:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 39/47] arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>

commit acfb3b883f6d6a4b5d27ad7fdded11f6a09ae6dd upstream.

KVM doesn't follow the SMCCC when it comes to unimplemented calls,
and inject an UNDEF instead of returning an error. Since firmware
calls are now used for security mitigation, they are becoming more
common, and the undef is counter productive.

Instead, let's follow the SMCCC which states that -1 must be returned
to the caller when getting an unknown function number.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 
 	ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
 		return 1;
 	}
 
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
-	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
 	return 1;
 }