[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180122102857.GC403@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:28:57 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
rostedt@...e.goodmis.org, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] printk: Console owner and waiter logic cleanup
On (01/22/18 17:56), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> Assume the following,
But more importantly we are missing another huge thing - console_unlock().
Suppose:
console_lock();
<< preemption >>
printk
printk
..
printk
console_unlock()
for (;;) {
call_console_drivers()
dump_stack
queue IRQ work
IRQ work >>
flush_printk_safe
printk_deferred()
...
printk_deferred()
<< iret
}
This should explode: sleepable console_unlock() may reschedule,
printk_safe flush bypasses recursion checks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists