[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1516652825.9521.64.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:27:05 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
x86@...nel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com
Subject: Re: [v8,02/12] objtool: Allow alternatives to be ignored
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:25 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> It uses "-mindirect-branch=thunk -mindirect-branch-loop=pause
> -fno-jump-tables", though I don't know if that even exists in
> upstream gcc (it is the gcc use for Chrome OS builds). I'll pass
> your feedback to our compiler team.
We moved on from that and the upstream retpoline support in the kernel
won't recognise it.
> Either case, I think it is less than optimal that objtool crashes
> with _any_ object code.
Yeah, I'll give you that one :)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists